Chapter 2: Core Manufacturing Concepts and Terminology
Introduction: Speaking the Language of the Shop Floor
Picture this: You're in a conference room at a mid-sized automotive supplier. The VP of Operations says, "Our OEE is at 68%, mainly due to availability losses during changeovers. We need better backflushing from MES to ERP so our BOM accuracy improves and MRP doesn't overorder components."
If these terms sound like alphabet soup, you're not alone—but you can't afford to be confused. In manufacturing, precision in language equals precision in execution. Misunderstanding "lead time" versus "cycle time" can result in a $2M inventory miscalculation. Confusing "discrete" and "process" manufacturing can lead you to propose entirely the wrong system architecture.
This chapter is your Rosetta Stone for manufacturing IT consulting. We'll decode the essential concepts, define the critical terminology, and show you how to speak fluently with plant managers, engineers, and C-suite executives. Mastering this language isn't just about communication—it's about credibility, accurate requirements gathering, and designing solutions that actually work.
Manufacturing Process Types: Understanding the Fundamentals
Not all manufacturing is created equal. The way products are made fundamentally shapes the IT systems, data models, and KPIs that matter. Before you recommend any technology, you must understand which type of manufacturing your client operates.
Discrete Manufacturing
Definition: Production of distinct items that can be counted, touched, and disassembled. Each unit has a unique identity.
Examples:
- Automotive: Cars, engines, transmissions
- Aerospace: Aircraft, satellites, turbines
- Electronics: Smartphones, computers, circuit boards
- Industrial Equipment: Pumps, motors, HVAC systems
Characteristics:
- Bill of Materials (BOM): Hierarchical structure of components
- Assembly: Parts come together to form a product
- Serialization: Often tracked by serial number or lot number
- Variability: High-mix, low-volume OR low-mix, high-volume
- Quality: Measured per unit (pass/fail, defects per million)
IT Systems Emphasis:
- PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) for complex BOMs
- Work order management and routing
- Serialization and traceability
- Capacity planning and scheduling
Table 2.1: Discrete Manufacturing KPIs
| KPI | Description | Typical Target | IT System Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Units Per Hour (UPH) | Throughput rate | Varies by product | MES, SCADA |
| First Pass Yield (FPY) | % of units passing without rework | >95% | MES, QMS |
| Takt Time | Available time / customer demand | Match demand | MES, ERP |
| Changeover Time | Time to switch from Product A to Product B | <10 min (SMED) | MES, operator logs |
| Scrap Rate | % of materials wasted | <2% | MES, ERP |
Real-World Example: At a John Deere tractor assembly plant, each tractor has a unique configuration—cab color, engine type, tire size, GPS package. The BOM has 5,000+ line items, and no two tractors might be identical. IT systems must track which specific components went into serial number XYZ123 for warranty, recall, and compliance purposes.
Process Manufacturing
Definition: Production where ingredients are combined through chemical reactions, heating, fermentation, or other transformations. The final product cannot be disassembled back into its components.
Examples:
- Food & Beverage: Beer, yogurt, cereal, soft drinks
- Chemicals: Paints, adhesives, petrochemicals, fertilizers
- Pharmaceuticals: Tablets, injections, biologics
- Cosmetics: Shampoos, lotions, makeup
Characteristics:
- Recipe/Formula: Specifies ingredients, quantities, and process steps
- Batch or Continuous: Produced in discrete batches (beer) or continuously (gasoline refining)
- Homogeneity: Product is uniform; individual units aren't unique
- Quality: Measured by sample testing (viscosity, pH, potency)
- By-Products and Waste: Often produce secondary materials
IT Systems Emphasis:
- Recipe management and versioning
- Batch genealogy and traceability (which ingredients went into which batch)
- SPC (Statistical Process Control) for quality
- Process historians for time-series data (temperature, pressure)
- Clean-in-Place (CIP) and sanitation tracking
Table 2.2: Process Manufacturing KPIs
| KPI | Description | Typical Target | IT System Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Batch Yield | Actual output / theoretical output | >98% | MES, SCADA |
| First Pass Right (FPR) | % of batches passing spec without rework | >95% | QMS, LIMS |
| SPC Cp/Cpk | Process capability indices | Cpk >1.33 | QMS, SPC software |
| CIP Cycle Time | Time for cleaning between batches | Minimize | MES, SCADA |
| Shelf Life Compliance | % of product within expiry targets | 100% | ERP, QMS |
Real-World Example: At a Coca-Cola bottling plant, the syrup recipe is tightly controlled. Each batch (say, 10,000 liters) must have exact proportions of water, sugar, flavoring, and carbonation. If a quality issue arises, the system must trace back to the specific batch of sugar (Lot# S-45321) and water treatment run (Run# W-2024-05-18-03) to identify the root cause.
Continuous Manufacturing
Definition: A subset of process manufacturing where production runs 24/7 without stopping. Product flows continuously through the process.
Examples:
- Oil refining
- Steel production
- Chemical plants (ammonia, ethylene)
- Pulp and paper mills
- Power generation
Characteristics:
- Never Stops: Shutdowns only for maintenance (every 1-5 years)
- High Volume, Low Variability: Same product for weeks/months
- Capital Intensive: Facilities cost billions of dollars
- Safety Critical: Process upsets can be catastrophic
- Real-Time Control: Millisecond-level adjustments via DCS (Distributed Control Systems)
IT Systems Emphasis:
- DCS and advanced process control (APC)
- Real-time historians (OSIsoft PI, Honeywell PHD)
- Predictive maintenance (equipment failures halt entire plant)
- Energy management and optimization
- Safety instrumented systems (SIS)
Key Difference from Batch:
- Batch: Start → Process → Stop → Start next batch
- Continuous: Always running, product constantly flowing
Hybrid Manufacturing
Many modern manufacturers blend discrete and process approaches, known as hybrid or mixed-mode manufacturing.
Examples:
- Automotive: Painting (process) + assembly (discrete)
- Electronics: SMT soldering paste application (process) + component placement (discrete)
- Food: Dough mixing (process) + cookie cutting and packaging (discrete)
- Pharmaceuticals: Drug formulation (process) + tablet pressing and packaging (discrete)
IT Challenge: You need systems that handle both discrete work orders (with BOMs and routings) and process batch records (with formulas and process parameters). This is why platforms like SAP S/4HANA and Siemens Opcenter offer both MES-Discrete and MES-Process modules.
The Core Data Structures: BOM, Routing, and Work Orders
These three structures are the backbone of manufacturing planning and execution. Understanding them deeply is non-negotiable.
Bill of Materials (BOM)
Definition: A structured, hierarchical list of all components, sub-assemblies, and raw materials required to manufacture a product.
BOM Structure Example: Office Chair
BOM Types:
| BOM Type | Purpose | Managed By | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering BOM (EBOM) | Design intent from CAD | PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) | All components as designed, regardless of how they're procured |
| Manufacturing BOM (MBOM) | How it's actually built | ERP + MES | May group components into kits; reflects assembly sequence |
| Service BOM | Spare parts and maintenance | Service Management System | Includes wear items, consumables |
| Sales BOM | Customer-facing configurations | CRM, Configure-Price-Quote (CPQ) | Options and add-ons customers can select |
BOM Attributes:
| Attribute | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Parent Item | The finished good or sub-assembly | FG-CHAIR-001 |
| Child Item | Component or sub-assembly | SC-100 (Seat Cushion) |
| Quantity | How many of the child per parent | 4 bolts per seat assembly |
| Unit of Measure (UOM) | How the component is measured | Each, kg, liters, meters |
| Scrap Factor | Expected waste percentage | 2% scrap on fabric cutting |
| Lead Time Offset | When component is needed relative to start | Install cushion at Step 3 |
| Effectivity Dates | When this BOM version is valid | Effective from 2024-06-01 |
| Phantom Items | Sub-assembly not stocked, built on-the-fly | Kits assembled just-in-time |
Common BOM Challenges:
| Challenge | Symptom | IT Impact | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOM Inaccuracy | MRP orders wrong quantities | Stockouts or excess inventory | Regular BOM audits, engineering change control |
| EBOM vs MBOM Sync | Engineering changes don't reach production | Building obsolete designs | PLM ↔ ERP integration, change workflows |
| Configuration Explosion | Millions of possible combinations | Unmanageable SKU count | Modular BOMs, variant configuration |
| Phantom Item Misuse | Inventory discrepancies | Physical stock doesn't match system | Clear phantom policy, regular cycle counts |
Real-World Scenario: An aerospace manufacturer makes engine control units with 200+ variants based on aircraft model, engine type, and customer options. Instead of maintaining 200 BOMs, they use a super BOM with variant options. During work order creation, the configurator selects the correct components based on order specifications, generating a configured BOM on-the-fly.
Routing
Definition: The sequence of operations, work centers, and resources required to manufacture a product.
Routing Structure Example: Office Chair Assembly
Table 2.3: Routing for Office Chair (FG-CHAIR-001)
| Op # | Operation Description | Work Center | Std Time (min) | Setup Time (min) | Machine | Labor Required | Quality Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Kitting | WC-KIT-01 | 5 | 0 | Manual | 1 operator | Visual inspection |
| 20 | Attach Gas Cylinder to Base | WC-ASM-01 | 2 | 10 | Pneumatic press | 1 operator | Torque check |
| 30 | Install Casters | WC-ASM-01 | 3 | 0 | Manual | 1 operator | N/A |
| 40 | Assemble Seat to Backrest | WC-ASM-02 | 4 | 5 | Manual + fixtures | 1 operator | Alignment check |
| 50 | Mount Seat Assembly to Base | WC-ASM-02 | 3 | 0 | Manual | 1 operator | Load test |
| 60 | Final Inspection | WC-QC-01 | 2 | 0 | Test rig | 1 QC inspector | 15-point checklist |
| 70 | Packaging | WC-PACK-01 | 5 | 0 | Manual | 1 operator | Shipping label scan |
Key Routing Attributes:
- Operation Number: Sequential identifier (10, 20, 30... allows insertions like 15, 25)
- Work Center: Where the operation is performed (links to capacity planning)
- Standard Time: Expected duration per unit (used for costing and scheduling)
- Setup Time: One-time preparation before a batch (e.g., tooling changes)
- Resource Requirements: Machines, labor, tooling, fixtures
- Quality Gates: Inspection points and acceptance criteria
Routing Types:
| Type | Description | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Linear Routing | Every product follows the exact same sequence | High-volume, standardized products |
| Network Routing | Conditional branches based on options | "If customer selected leather, go to Op 42; if fabric, skip to Op 50" |
| Alternate Routing | Multiple ways to make the same product | Backup work centers if primary is down |
| Overlapping Routing | Next operation starts before previous finishes | Continuous flow, reduce lead time |
MES Role: The MES (Manufacturing Execution System) dispatches work orders based on routings, tracks which operation is currently in progress, collects actual time vs. standard time, and enforces quality gates.
Work Order
Definition: An instruction to produce a specific quantity of a specific product using a defined BOM and routing.
Work Order Lifecycle:
Work Order Structure:
| Field | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Work Order Number | Unique identifier | WO-2024-05-12345 |
| Product (SKU) | What to produce | FG-CHAIR-001 |
| Quantity | How many units | 500 units |
| BOM Version | Which BOM to use | BOM-CHAIR-001-Rev.C |
| Routing Version | Which routing to use | RTG-CHAIR-001-Rev.B |
| Planned Start Date | When to begin | 2024-06-01 08:00 |
| Planned End Date | When to finish | 2024-06-05 17:00 |
| Priority | Relative urgency | High / Normal / Low |
| Work Center | Where it's made (first operation) | WC-ASM-01 |
| Status | Current state | Created / Released / In Progress / Completed |
| Parent Order | Sales order or forecast driving demand | SO-123456 |
Work Order Reporting Methods:
| Method | Description | Pros | Cons | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Backflushing | Automatically deduct components when WO is completed | Fast, low operator burden | Assumes BOM accuracy, no scrap tracking | High-volume, stable processes |
| Preflush (Forward Flush) | Deduct components when WO is released | Simple inventory relief | Inaccurate if WO is canceled | Kitting operations |
| Point-of-Use | Deduct as each operation consumes materials | Accurate WIP tracking | Requires scanning at each step | Aerospace, pharma (high traceability) |
Confirmation Data Captured:
When a work order is completed, the system captures:
- Actual Quantity Produced: Good units, scrap units, rework units
- Actual Time: Labor hours, machine hours per operation
- Actual Materials: Component lots consumed (for traceability)
- Quality Results: Inspection measurements, pass/fail status
- Downtime Events: Reasons and duration of stoppages
- Operator IDs: Who performed each operation (for training, certification)
ERP ↔ MES Integration:
Material Requirements Planning (MRP)
Definition: A system for calculating material needs based on demand, inventory on-hand, and lead times, then generating purchase requisitions and production orders to meet that demand.
MRP Logic Flow
Table 2.4: MRP Calculation Example
Assume we need to produce 1,000 Office Chairs (FG-CHAIR-001) by June 30.
| Item | Level | Qty per Parent | Gross Requirement | On-Hand Inventory | Scheduled Receipts | Net Requirement | Order Quantity | Order Due Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office Chair | 0 | — | 1,000 | 50 | 0 | 950 | 950 | June 30 |
| Seat Assembly | 1 | 1 | 950 | 200 | 0 | 750 | 750 | June 28 (2 days LT) |
| Base Assembly | 1 | 1 | 950 | 100 | 500 (PO in-transit) | 350 | 350 | June 25 (5 days LT) |
| Gas Lift Cylinder | 2 | 1 | 350 | 0 | 0 | 350 | 400 (round up to MOQ) | June 18 (7 days LT) |
MRP Parameters:
| Parameter | Definition | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Lead Time | Time from order placement to receipt | Determines order due date |
| Safety Stock | Buffer inventory to handle variability | Increases order quantity |
| Lot Sizing | How much to order (Fixed, EOQ, Lot-for-Lot) | Balances setup costs vs. holding costs |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Vendor-imposed minimum | May order more than needed |
| Scrap Factor | Expected waste percentage | Increases gross requirement |
MRP Limitations:
| Limitation | Explanation | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Assumes Infinite Capacity | Doesn't check if work centers are available | Use APS (Advanced Planning & Scheduling) |
| Fixed Lead Times | Doesn't account for queue time variability | Dynamic lead time models, finite scheduling |
| No Consideration of WIP | Treats everything as "not started" or "done" | Real-time MES feedback to ERP |
| Nervousness | Small demand changes cause large order swings | Dampening parameters, planning fences |
Real-World Challenge: A consumer electronics manufacturer ran MRP daily, and every day it rescheduled thousands of purchase orders, confusing suppliers and increasing costs. Solution: Implement planning time fences—within 2 weeks, MRP can't automatically reschedule; beyond 2 weeks, it can. This reduced supplier chaos by 70%.
Time-Based Metrics: Takt Time, Cycle Time, and Lead Time
These three metrics are constantly confused but are fundamentally different. Mastering them is critical.
Takt Time
Definition: The rate at which finished products must be produced to meet customer demand.
Formula:
Takt Time = Available Production Time per Period / Customer Demand per Period
Example:
- Customer orders: 400 units per day
- Available production time: 8 hours/day = 480 minutes
- Takt Time = 480 min / 400 units = 1.2 minutes per unit
Meaning: To meet demand, you must complete one unit every 1.2 minutes.
Takt Time is:
- Demand-Driven: Set by the customer, not by your process capability
- A Target: The pace your process must achieve
- Used for Line Balancing: Each workstation should take ≤ Takt Time
IT Application: MES systems can display real-time Takt vs. Actual Cycle Time on Andon boards, alerting operators when they fall behind.
Cycle Time
Definition: The actual time it takes to complete one unit through a specific operation or the entire process.
Example:
- Operation 20 (Attach Gas Cylinder): 2 minutes per unit
- Operation 30 (Install Casters): 3 minutes per unit
Cycle Time is:
- Process-Driven: Based on your current capability
- Measurable: Collected by MES, operators, or sensors
- Variable: Can change due to operator skill, machine condition, etc.
Ideal State:
Cycle Time ≤ Takt Time
If Cycle Time > Takt Time, you can't meet demand without overtime or adding capacity.
Lead Time
Definition: The total elapsed time from order placement (or start of production) to delivery (or completion).
Types of Lead Time:
| Type | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing Lead Time | Time from WO release to WO completion | 5 days for a batch of 1,000 chairs |
| Procurement Lead Time | Time from PO issuance to receipt | 30 days for imported components |
| Customer Lead Time | Time from order to delivery | 10 days quoted to customer |
| Cumulative Lead Time | Sum of all sequential lead times | Longest path through BOM + routing |
Lead Time Components:
Total Lead Time = Queue Time + Setup Time + Run Time + Wait Time + Move Time
| Component | Description | Typical % | Improvement Opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Queue Time | Waiting for the work center to be available | 60-80% | Better scheduling, level loading |
| Setup Time | Preparing machine/tools | 5-15% | SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die) |
| Run Time | Actual processing | 10-20% | Process optimization, automation |
| Wait Time | Waiting for next operation or inspection | 5-10% | Overlapping operations, batch size reduction |
| Move Time | Transportation between work centers | 1-5% | Cell layout, automated material handling |
Shocking Reality: In many job shops, value-added time (run time) is only 10-15% of total lead time. The other 85-90% is waste.
IT Impact: Real-time production tracking (MES) exposes where time is being lost, enabling targeted improvement initiatives.
Table 2.5: Takt Time vs. Cycle Time vs. Lead Time Summary
| Metric | Driven By | Measures | Typical Value | IT System |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Takt Time | Customer demand | Required production pace | 1-5 minutes (high volume) | ERP demand, MES display |
| Cycle Time | Process capability | Actual production pace per operation | Varies by operation | MES, SCADA, time studies |
| Lead Time | Entire value stream | Order-to-delivery duration | Days to weeks | ERP, MES, supply chain system |
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE): The Gold Standard
OEE was introduced briefly in Chapter 1, but it deserves deeper exploration as it's the single most important shop-floor metric.
OEE Formula Breakdown
OEE = Availability × Performance × Quality
Let's walk through a real production shift:
Scenario: 8-Hour Shift, Producing Widgets
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Shift Duration | 480 minutes |
| Planned Downtime (breaks, meetings) | 30 minutes |
| Planned Production Time | 450 minutes |
| Unplanned Downtime (breakdowns, changeovers) | 50 minutes |
| Operating Time | 400 minutes |
| Ideal Cycle Time | 0.5 min/part |
| Total Parts Produced | 700 |
| Good Parts (no defects) | 665 |
Availability:
Availability = Operating Time / Planned Production Time = 400 / 450 = 88.9%
Performance:
Ideal Production (if running at full speed for 400 min) = 400 / 0.5 = 800 parts Actual Production = 700 parts Performance = 700 / 800 = 87.5%
Quality:
Quality = Good Parts / Total Parts = 665 / 700 = 95%
OEE:
OEE = 88.9% × 87.5% × 95% = 73.8%
Interpretation:
- 73.8% OEE is below world-class (>85%) but above poor (<60%)
- Top loss: Availability (11.1% loss) due to unplanned downtime
- Action: Prioritize predictive maintenance to reduce breakdowns
The Six Big Losses
OEE losses fall into six categories:
Table 2.6: Six Big Losses Framework
| Category | Loss Type | Examples | OEE Component Affected | IT Solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Downtime | 1. Equipment Failures | Breakdowns, crashes | Availability | Predictive maintenance (IoT sensors, ML) |
| Downtime | 2. Setup & Adjustments | Changeovers, warm-ups | Availability | SMED techniques, digital work instructions |
| Speed Losses | 3. Idling & Minor Stops | Jams, sensor blockages | Performance | Root cause analysis (MES event tracking) |
| Speed Losses | 4. Reduced Speed | Running below rated speed | Performance | Process optimization, SPC |
| Defects | 5. Startup Rejects | Scrap during ramp-up | Quality | Statistical process control, auto-adjustments |
| Defects | 6. Production Rejects | Scrap during steady-state | Quality | AI quality inspection, closed-loop feedback |
Real-World Example: A food packaging line had OEE of 62%. Pareto analysis (from MES data) revealed:
- 40% of losses: Availability (mostly jams in the labeling machine)
- 35% of losses: Performance (line ran at 85% of rated speed)
- 25% of losses: Quality (inconsistent seal quality)
Solution:
- Installed vision system to detect jams early → +8% OEE
- Upgraded servo motors for consistent speed → +5% OEE
- Added inline seal inspection → +4% OEE
New OEE: 79%, a 27% improvement in effective capacity.
Lean Manufacturing and Continuous Improvement
Manufacturing isn't static—it's a continuous journey of eliminating waste and improving flow. IT consultants must understand Lean principles to design systems that enable, not hinder, improvement.
The Eight Wastes (DOWNTIME)
| Waste | Description | IT Enabler |
|---|---|---|
| Defects | Producing scrap or rework | AI quality inspection, SPC alerts |
| Overproduction | Making more than needed | Pull systems (Kanban), real-time demand signals |
| Waiting | Idle time between operations | MES scheduling, bottleneck visibility |
| Non-Utilized Talent | Not using people's skills/ideas | Collaboration platforms, digital suggestion systems |
| Transportation | Unnecessary movement of materials | AGVs, warehouse management systems |
| Inventory | Excess stock | Real-time inventory tracking, JIT replenishment |
| Motion | Unnecessary movement of people | Ergonomic workstation design, pick-to-light |
| Excess Processing | Doing more than customer requires | Value stream mapping, standard work |
Six Sigma and Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Six Sigma Goal: Reduce process variation to achieve ≤ 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO).
Process Capability Indices:
Cp (Process Capability):
Cp = (USL - LSL) / (6 × σ)
Where:
- USL = Upper Specification Limit
- LSL = Lower Specification Limit
- σ = Process Standard Deviation
Cpk (Process Capability Index, accounting for centering):
Cpk = min[(USL - μ) / (3σ), (μ - LSL) / (3σ)]
Table 2.7: Process Capability Interpretation
| Cpk Value | Interpretation | DPMO | Quality Level | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 1.0 | Process not capable | >2,700 | Unacceptable | Immediate improvement required |
| 1.0 - 1.33 | Minimally capable | 2,700 - 63 | Acceptable | Monitor closely, improve |
| 1.33 - 1.67 | Capable | 63 - 0.6 | Good | Maintain, continue monitoring |
| > 1.67 | Highly capable | <0.6 | Excellent | Possible over-engineering; relax tolerances? |
SPC Control Charts:
Control charts visualize process stability over time.
Example: X-bar Chart for Widget Diameter
UCL (Upper Control Limit) ─────────────────── 10.05 mm • • • Target (Mean) ────────── • ─ • ─ • ─ • ────── 10.00 mm • • • LCL (Lower Control Limit) ─────────────────── 9.95 mm Sample: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Rules for Out-of-Control:
- Any point outside UCL/LCL → Special cause variation
- 7+ consecutive points above or below centerline → Process shift
- Increasing or decreasing trend → Tool wear, drift
IT System Role: QMS and MES systems automatically collect measurements, calculate control limits, and alert when processes go out of control—enabling real-time intervention.
Kaizen and Continuous Improvement
Kaizen (改善): Japanese for "change for better." A philosophy of continuous, incremental improvement involving everyone from the CEO to frontline workers.
Kaizen Event Structure
Table 2.8: Typical 5-Day Kaizen Event
| Day | Activities | Deliverables |
|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Kick-off, current state mapping, gemba walk | Problem statement, baseline metrics |
| Day 2 | Root cause analysis (5 Whys, Fishbone), brainstorming | List of improvement ideas |
| Day 3 | Implement quick wins, test solutions | Pilot implementations |
| Day 4 | Refine solutions, create standard work | Updated procedures, visual controls |
| Day 5 | Validate results, document, present to leadership | Improved metrics, sustainability plan |
IT's Role in Kaizen:
- Before: Provide baseline data (OEE, defect rates, cycle times) from MES/SCADA
- During: Support rapid testing of new workflows in systems
- After: Update standard work in digital systems, track improvement sustainability via dashboards
Data and Interoperability: Bringing It All Together
Manufacturing concepts only matter if the data flows correctly between systems.
The Master Data Challenge
Master Data = The nouns of manufacturing:
- Products (SKUs, part numbers)
- BOMs and routings
- Customers and suppliers
- Equipment and work centers
- Locations (warehouses, bins)
Transactional Data = The verbs:
- Work orders, purchase orders, sales orders
- Inventory movements, shipments
- Quality inspections, maintenance tickets
Challenge: Master data is maintained in multiple systems (ERP, PLM, MES, QMS), and discrepancies cause chaos.
Common Discrepancies:
| Issue | Example | Impact | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOM Mismatch | PLM has Rev. D, ERP has Rev. C | Building obsolete products | Single source of truth (PLM master, sync to ERP) |
| Routing Drift | MES has 7 operations, ERP has 6 | Incorrect costing, scheduling | Change control workflow, periodic reconciliation |
| Duplicate Parts | Same gasket as PN-1234 and GSKT-5678 | Inventory bloat, missed opportunities for consolidation | Data stewardship, deduplication tools |
| Stale Data | Discontinued parts still active | MRP generating purchase reqs for obsolete items | Lifecycle management, automated archiving |
ISA-95 Data Flows
Recall from Chapter 1 that ISA-95 defines five levels. Data must flow bidirectionally but with clear governance.
Table 2.9: ISA-95 Data Exchange Examples
| Direction | Data Type | Example | Frequency | Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP → MES | Work Order | Produce 500 units of SKU-123 | Hourly | REST API, OPC UA |
| MES → ERP | Production Confirmation | Completed 480 units, 20 scrapped | Per shift | REST API, message queue |
| PLM → MES | Work Instructions | Updated assembly procedure (Rev. E) | On change | File transfer, API |
| MES → QMS | Quality Results | Inspection measurements, lot# | Per test | Database replication, API |
| SCADA → MES | Equipment Events | Machine X stopped, reason code = jam | Real-time | OPC UA, MQTT |
| MES → SCADA | Recipe/Setpoint | Load Recipe 42, set temp to 185°C | Per batch | OPC UA |
Security and Compliance: Terminology Edition
Electronic Records and Signatures (FDA 21 CFR Part 11)
In regulated industries (pharma, medical devices), manufacturing records must meet strict criteria.
ALCOA+ Principles:
| Principle | Meaning | IT Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Attributable | Record linked to person who created it | User authentication, digital signatures |
| Legible | Readable throughout retention period | Archival formats (PDF/A), metadata |
| Contemporaneous | Created at the time of activity | Time-stamped entries, no backdating |
| Original | Primary record (not a copy) | Master database, audit trails |
| Accurate | Truthful, error-free | Data validation, review workflows |
| +Complete | All data present | No selective deletion, full context |
| +Consistent | Chronological sequence preserved | Immutable logs, blockchain (emerging) |
| +Enduring | Durable for retention period (often 10+ years) | Backups, disaster recovery |
| +Available | Accessible for audits/inspections | Search, reporting tools, export functions |
Example: A pharmaceutical MES must log:
- Who: Operator ID (Jane Smith, badge #4321)
- What: Added 50 kg of Ingredient B to Batch XYZ
- When: 2024-05-18 14:32:17 UTC
- Electronic Signature: Reviewed by Supervisor (John Doe, badge #1234) at 14:35:22 UTC
This record must be tamper-evident and retrievable for FDA inspections up to 10 years later.
KPIs and Metrics Glossary
Table 2.10: Essential Manufacturing KPIs
| KPI | Formula | Target | System Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEE | Availability × Performance × Quality | >85% | MES |
| First Pass Yield (FPY) | (Good Units / Total Units) × 100% | >95% | MES, QMS |
| Scrap Rate | (Scrap Units / Total Units) × 100% | <2% | MES, ERP |
| On-Time Delivery (OTD) | (Orders Delivered On-Time / Total Orders) × 100% | >95% | ERP |
| Schedule Adherence | (Actual Production / Planned Production) × 100% | >98% | MES |
| Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) | Total Operating Time / Number of Failures | Maximize | CMMS, MES |
| Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) | Total Downtime / Number of Failures | Minimize | CMMS |
| Inventory Turns | Cost of Goods Sold / Average Inventory Value | 6-12 (varies) | ERP |
| Dock-to-Dock Time | Time from receiving materials to shipping finished goods | Minimize | ERP, MES, WMS |
| Cost per Unit | (Labor + Materials + Overhead) / Units Produced | Minimize | ERP |
Implementation Checklist: Building a Strong Foundation
Implementing systems that accurately reflect these concepts requires discipline:
Phase 1: Data Foundation
- Define and publish a Manufacturing Data Dictionary (200+ terms)
- Establish BOM governance: Who can create/change, approval workflows, revision control
- Standardize numbering schemes for parts, work orders, batches, equipment
- Implement unit of measure (UOM) conversions (kg ↔ lbs, meters ↔ feet)
- Map master data ownership (PLM owns EBOM, ERP owns MBOM, etc.)
Phase 2: Process Standardization
- Document standard routings for top 80% of products
- Define work center calendars (shifts, holidays, planned downtime)
- Establish lead time standards by product family and supplier
- Create quality inspection plans tied to routings
- Implement change control process (ECO/ECN workflows)
Phase 3: System Integration
- Map PLM ↔ ERP integration for BOM/routing synchronization
- Design ERP ↔ MES integration for work order dispatch and confirmation
- Connect SCADA → Historian → MES → ERP data pipeline
- Integrate QMS ↔ MES for inline quality data capture
- Build dashboards for OEE, FPY, OTD by plant/line/shift
Phase 4: Training and Adoption
- Train planners on MRP logic, lead times, lot sizing
- Train engineers on BOM/routing creation and change control
- Train operators on work order reporting, quality data entry
- Train supervisors on OEE interpretation and Kaizen facilitation
- Establish data stewardship roles and KPIs (e.g., BOM accuracy >98%)
Common Pitfalls and Mitigations
Table 2.11: Terminology Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Consequence | Prevention |
|---|---|---|
| Using "Lead Time" Ambiguously | Procurement orders parts too late | Always specify: Customer LT, Mfg LT, Procurement LT |
| Confusing Takt Time and Cycle Time | Over-capacity or under-capacity investments | Takt = demand-driven; Cycle = capability-driven |
| BOM Inaccuracy | MRP generates wrong orders | Regular BOM audits (target: >98% accuracy) |
| Ignoring Scrap Factors | Chronic material shortages | Build scrap% into BOM, track actual scrap in MES |
| No Definition of "Downtime" | Inconsistent OEE across plants | Publish downtime taxonomy, enforce in MES |
| Mixing Discrete and Process Logic | Wrong system architecture | Identify hybrid areas, use appropriate MES modules |
| Phantom Items Without Governance | Inventory discrepancies | Clear policy on when to use phantoms, cycle count frequently |
Conclusion: The Foundation for Everything Else
If Chapter 1 was the "why" of manufacturing IT, this chapter is the "what." You now understand:
- The difference between discrete, process, and continuous manufacturing and how it shapes IT architecture
- BOM, routing, and work orders as the core data structures that drive planning and execution
- MRP logic and why it's both powerful and limited
- Time-based metrics (takt, cycle, lead time) and how to use them correctly
- OEE as the definitive shop-floor metric and how to calculate and improve it
- Lean and Six Sigma fundamentals that inform how systems should enable continuous improvement
- Master data governance as the backbone of accurate systems
- Compliance terminology (ALCOA+, 21 CFR Part 11) critical for regulated industries
Mastering this terminology isn't about memorization—it's about thinking like a manufacturer. When a client says "Our Cpk is below 1.33 on the seal width, and it's driving scrap," you should immediately know:
- They have a process capability issue (Cpk < 1.33 = barely capable)
- It's affecting quality (scrap)
- You should look at SPC data to see if it's common cause (process design) or special cause (external factors)
- The solution might involve process re-engineering, better sensors, or tighter supplier controls
This fluency transforms you from an IT vendor into a trusted advisor. In the next chapter, we'll apply these concepts to specific manufacturing verticals, each with their own unique terminology, regulations, and IT demands.
Chapter Summary
| Concept | Key Points | IT Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing Types | Discrete (BOMs, assembly) vs. Process (recipes, batches) vs. Continuous (24/7 flow) | Determines MES architecture, data models, and integration patterns |
| BOM | Hierarchical list of components; EBOM (design) vs. MBOM (as-built) | PLM ↔ ERP sync is critical; inaccuracies ripple through MRP and costing |
| Routing | Sequence of operations, work centers, times | Drives MES dispatching, capacity planning, and labor costing |
| Work Order | Instruction to produce; lifecycle from Created → Closed | ERP ↔ MES integration for dispatch and confirmation is foundational |
| MRP | Calculates material needs based on demand and lead times | Limited by assumptions (infinite capacity, fixed LT); needs real-time MES data for accuracy |
| Takt / Cycle / Lead Time | Takt = demand pace; Cycle = actual pace; Lead = total duration | Confusion causes capacity errors; MES must track and display all three |
| OEE | Availability × Performance × Quality; composite measure of losses | Real-time MES calculation is the #1 shop-floor KPI for improvement initiatives |
| Lean & Six Sigma | Eliminate waste, reduce variation | IT systems must support visual management, SPC, and rapid experimentation |
| Master Data Governance | Single source of truth for BOMs, routings, parts | Without governance, systems diverge and decisions are based on bad data |
| ALCOA+ (Regulated Industries) | Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate + Complete, Consistent, Enduring, Available | Shapes MES and QMS design for pharma, medical devices, food |
Discussion Questions
-
BOM Accuracy: What processes and tools would you implement to achieve and maintain >98% BOM accuracy in a multi-plant organization?
-
MRP vs. APS: When is MRP insufficient, and when should you recommend Advanced Planning & Scheduling (APS)?
-
OEE Barriers: What organizational or cultural factors prevent companies from accurately measuring OEE, and how can IT help overcome them?
-
Hybrid Manufacturing: How would you design a system architecture for a facility that does both discrete assembly and process batch operations?
-
Time Metric Confusion: How would you explain the difference between takt time, cycle time, and lead time to a non-technical stakeholder?
Exercises
Exercise 1: BOM Explosion
Given this BOM for a Laptop Computer:
- Laptop (FG-LAPTOP-001)
- Motherboard (MB-001) — Qty: 1
- CPU (CPU-i7) — Qty: 1
- RAM (RAM-16GB) — Qty: 2
- Display (DISP-15) — Qty: 1
- Battery (BAT-6CELL) — Qty: 1
- Keyboard (KB-US) — Qty: 1
- Motherboard (MB-001) — Qty: 1
Question: If you need to produce 500 laptops, how many of each component do you need? (Assume no scrap, no inventory on-hand.)
Exercise 2: OEE Calculation
A production line runs for 10 hours (600 minutes). Planned downtime for lunch is 30 minutes. Unplanned downtime (breakdowns) is 60 minutes. The ideal cycle time is 1 minute per unit. The line produced 450 units, of which 430 were good.
Calculate:
- Availability
- Performance
- Quality
- OEE
Exercise 3: Takt Time vs. Cycle Time
Customer demand is 200 units per day. Available production time is 8 hours (480 minutes). Current cycle time is 2.5 minutes per unit.
- What is the takt time?
- Can the process meet demand?
- If not, what are three options to close the gap?
Further Reading
- BOM Management: Ernie Orr, Bill of Materials Management. APICS, 2018.
- MRP and ERP: Thomas Vollmann et al., Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management. McGraw-Hill, 2011.
- Lean Manufacturing: James Womack & Daniel Jones, Lean Thinking. Free Press, 2003.
- Six Sigma: Mikel Harry & Richard Schroeder, Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy. Currency, 1999.
- ISA-95 Standard: https://www.isa.org/standards-and-publications/isa-standards/isa-standards-committees/isa95
Next Chapter Preview:
Now that you speak the language, Chapter 3 will apply these concepts to specific manufacturing verticals—automotive, aerospace, food & beverage, pharmaceuticals, and more. Each vertical has unique regulations, quality expectations, and IT system requirements. Understanding these nuances is what separates generalist IT consultants from manufacturing specialists.